A looming global energy crisis could directly affect Bitcoin miners |
Mining is the backbone of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but as energy consumption increases due to mining efforts, more miners will be pushed out of business. Of course, many Bitcoin enthusiasts believe that this could actually lead to an increase in value for these currencies. But what impact would a global shortage have on cryptocurrency?
Register now on Binance, add 50$ and get 100$ bonus voucher!
The “bitcoin miners for sale” is a looming global energy crisis that could directly affect Bitcoin miners. The world’s largest cryptocurrency has been on the rise, as its value increased by more than 1,500% in 2017.
According to the World Bank, global energy costs are expected to stay “historically high” until 2024. They predict that energy costs would “increase by more than 50% in 2022.” What does this suggest for the future of PoW mining, given that electricity is the sole direct cost to the Bitcoin mining network?
Mas Nakachi, Managing Director of XBTO, explained to us,
“An increase in global energy costs is anticipated to squeeze bitcoin miners’ profit margins, diminishing the overall motivation to mine bitcoin.”
A decrease in hashrate
The hashrate, which is the total amount of processing power dedicated to mining new blocks, is crucial to the Bitcoin network’s security. If the motivation to mine Bitcoin declines, it is possible that miners may leave the network. Bitcoin’s hashrate decreased by 40 percent in a single month in 2021 after Chinese miners were shut down. However, as the chart below shows, there is only a slender relationship between Bitcoin’s hashrate and its price movement. Bitcoin Maxis, on the other hand, is a widely disputed issue. The decline in hashrate in October 2020 had little effect on the subsequent bull market. Furthermore, although the hashrate fell precipitously in June 2021, the price stayed stable, rising to a new all-time high just a few months later.
Because Bitcoin’s design has a built-in safety termed ‘difficulty,’ markets do not panic if the hashrate lowers. The amount of electricity needed to mine a block decreases as the number of network members decreases. In the other direction, as the quantity of power provided to the network grows, so does the difficulty. This prevents assaults on the network caused by a rapid flood of mining power or an unusual incident, such as what occurred in China, when many miners left the network. Following the Chinese ban on miners, Kevin Zhang of Foundry, a large Bitcoin mining pool, told CNBC,
“As more hashrate leaves the network, the difficulty will decrease, and the hashrate that stays active on the network will get more for their proportionate part of the mining rewards,” explains the author.
The difficulty has increased.
Furthermore, Bitcoin difficulty just reached an all-time high, increasing the amount of electricity needed to mine a block. Mining a block grows more difficult as more processing power is added to the network. This is a method that ensures the supply of Bitcoin stays constant. As a result, we know that mining the remaining 2 million Bitcoins will take almost a century. “As Bitcoin mining grows more complex, the process sucks up more power,” argues Samuel Becker of Sofi Learn.
Bitcoin mining is predicted to grow in popularity and profitability over the next several years, reaching $4.5 billion by 2026. As the number of miners grows, the difficulty rises, lowering the Bitcoin payout per hash. Without accounting for energy expenses, the payout per 100TH/s is now 0.00042199BTC per day ($16.20).
Register now on Binance, add 50$ and get 100$ bonus voucher!
Large Bitcoin miners like Hut8, Greenridge, Hive, and Marathon have energy costs ranging from $22 to $40 per megawatt. For a firm like Hut8, with 2.54 E/H of mining power, this implies In 2019, the company’s power expenses reached $36.9 million, with a profit of $172,124. According to their annual report, if the price had increased by 30%, they would have lost $10.8 million. Granted, the top price of Bitcoin in 2019 was just $9,300, and they are known for hoarding their Bitcoin.
“The only seasonality that the Company encounters is due to anticipated variations in power pricing based on volatility in market natural gas prices, which impacts all of Hut 8’s facilities,” according to their annual report for 2021.
Natural gas costs have increased by 100% since December 2021, while the price of Bitcoin has decreased by 25%. The cost of operating a mining business has increased by 100% (assuming this cost has been passed on to the miner), but the return has decreased by 25% when measured in dollars.
TradingView is the source of this information.
“The Company may suffer risks of interruptions to its supply of electrical power and a rise in energy bills,” Hut8 adds to the risk factors associated with their business strategy. They do, however, disclose a number of agreements in existence, implying that fixed-price contracts have been implemented to limit this risk. Marathon, another significant mining, stated in their annual report that they pay a set cost of Further, Hut8 states that in the risk factors attributed to their business model, “The Company may face risks of disruptions to its supply of electrical power and an increase of electricity rates.” However, they list several agreements in place, indicating that fixed-price contracts have been put in place to mitigate this risk. Another large miner, Marathon, also states in their annual report that they pay a fixed cost of $0.042 per kWh for their electricity consumption..042 per kWh for their power use.
As a result, it is probable that the large miners that operate in part to help secure the network have fixed-priced energy contracts in place that will protect them from the World Bank’s stated increase in energy costs. However, given numerous UK energy businesses went bankrupt in 2021, there is still a chance that the energy providers themselves may be unable to respect the agreements.
In any case, Bitcoin miners abandoning the network would need an apocalyptic scenario to have any serious influence. If losing 65 percent of Bitcoin mining power in 2021 was only a stumbling block, an energy crisis is likely to have a similar impact.
Natural gas costs are at their highest since the invention of Bitcoin, although they were 100 percent higher in 2008 than they are today. Finally, according to Ark Investments, renewable energy accounts for 76% of Bitcoin mining power. The sun and wind are unconcerned about global economic turmoil, and renewable energy miners’ production prices aren’t either. Individual, private miners who depend on the old energy system seem to be the only ones who may be harmed by an energy crisis. In the next 24 months, everyone mining Bitcoin at home with an ASIC miner may need to switch to renewable energy or face hefty expenditures.
Obtain a Competitive Advantage in the Crypto Market
Join Edge to get access to our own Discord community, as well as more exclusive material and commentary.
Analyses of the whole chain
Snapshots of prices
a little more context
For just $19 a month, you can become a member right now. Examine all of the advantages.